Jim Gifford wrote these words on 10/12/05 19:16 CST: > Why should I follow BLFS standards. When BLFS doesn't respect the requests of > the other > community members. ie fam. BLFS just seems to do what they want to, and don't > care what > others think. Why should I respect BLFS boundaries, when BLFS couldn't even > agree to a > simple compromise that was suggested.
I'm sorry, it now seems as though your judgment is tainted by a grudge, more than what is best for the community. A team leader made a decision, as you have done. I accept that. We all must. When a team leader makes a decision you just live with it. Actually, I'm sorry I commented at all. I thought perhaps you didn't know that BLFS has a table of UID/GID's. But now I realize you are not following the table, simply because of bad feelings. Not that I am speaking for him, but I can say for a fact that Bruce did not base his decision on some past issue with LFS. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 20:11:00 up 18 days, 4:35, 3 users, load average: 1.00, 0.89, 0.51 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
