http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-03 11:22 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I am strongly against (2), because of the wrong ELF interpreter; > > (1) is OK for non-UTF8 book, and I'm not sure why you think that (1) is better than (2) since (1) tests both the wrong libraries and wrong dynamic linker. To me, they're both broken. (1) is equally bad for any build. It only causes an error in the UTF8 book since you have to build libidn in /tools. > As for the "nice sanity check", it is no longer nice because you have to > adjust > things for it to work properly. I suppose, but this is only because LFS is a very special case where we are using a cross-linker. In most installations, your toolchain would be pointed at the standard location and this wouldn't be an issue. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
