http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-05 07:13 ------- So, everyone likes 3. I tested it on an x86 box, and it works. Now, the one thing no one has commented on is the use of /lib/ld-linux.so.2. Maybe I'm being paranoid, but the dynamic linker doesn't always go by this name. It even says in the LFS book. Should it just be assumed that if you have a different name (e.g. /lib/ld.so.1) that you can fix the sed for yourself? I really don't want to scrap the solution for this reason, but just want everyone to be aware. If the LFS book is assuming x86 only, then this isn't a problem. I don't know what the official stance on that is, though. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
