http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:13 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> If we move what is in BLFS to LFS, with a good review of the text to make sure
> it fits its placement in LFS, I think we'd be handling it much better than a
> note box referencing a user to BLFS.
Well, I wouldn't call it a "good" review, necessarily, but having read it, I
think the information that is in BLFS is ideally suited to LFS, and can be
applied to LFS as-is (after BLFS editor's agreement is sought, of course).
> This is a far bigger issue than one library
> to link in to a particular package - the Cracklib comparison seems a different
> situation to me.
Yes, on second thoughts I agree.
So, here's the revised plan of attack for this bug then:
a) Incorporate BLFS' package management text in a new "6.2 Package Management"
section
b) Move the Note from the bottom of 6.1 over to the bottom of the new 6.2
section.
c) Remove the final paragraph in 6.1 ("To keep track of...") as it is now
catered far more fully in the new 6.2 section
(In reply to comment #4)
> If we are to follow LSB standards, we need to include RPM.
>
> http://lsbbook.gforge.freestandards.org/package.html#RPM
Nope, we're not going to recommend any particular package manager for folks.
We'll leave it up to them to choose the technique best suited to their needs.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
