http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1676
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-24 08:47 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Heh, my first thought on this was "no, no, definitely not!". However, RPM is > already mentioned in the BLFS text, so why not change the sentence it appears > in > to read: "Examples of package managers that follow this approach are RPM > (required by the LSB [hyperlink to the LSB spec]), pkg-utils, Debian's apt, > and > Gentoo's Portage system". Looks good to me. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
