On 3/31/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/31/06 15:23 CST: > > > Not that you are putting up the vote, but I don't agree with the bz2 > > only method. IMO, we should be hosting the exact versions found at > > the upstream website, be it tar.bz2 or whatever. > > And if they provide both .gz and .bz2 files? > > Flip a coin? (jk)
I usually go with bz2 if they're both there since they're usually smaller. But that parts not really important to me. I just want to know I'm getting an officially distributed archive. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
