#1663: IP Address tables are confusing
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |        Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  defect                  |       Status:  new                        
  
 Priority:  lowest                  |    Milestone:  6.2                        
  
Component:  Book                    |      Version:  SVN                        
  
 Severity:  normal                  |   Resolution:                             
  
 Keywords:                          |  
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 Although it is not clear, I think the ticket is referring to Section 7.11,
 Customizing the /etc/hosts File.

 In this section, FQDN is not defined.

 The discussion in the book (and the patch) needs to avoid the idea of
 Classful routing completely.  They are long depreciated.  There is not a
 single system on the internet today that is not CIDR.

 Instead of class, the most appropriate reference would be to the "normal"
 prefix  such as:
 {{{
 Private Network Address Range   Normal Prefix
 10.0.0.1  - 10.255.255.254        8
 172.x.0.1 - 172.x.255.254        16
 192.y.0.1 - 192.168.y.254        24
 }}}
 x is any number in the range 16-31[[br]]
 y is any nymber in the range 0-255

 Also, in the script, the following:

 [192.168.1.1] [<HOSTNAME>.example.org] [HOSTNAME]

 Would probably be more accurate as

 <192.168.1.1> <HOSTNAME.example.org> [alias1] [alias2] ...

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1663>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to