The overall idea is good but I don't care for the layout. Instead, I
would say:
Your host system should have the following software with the minimum
versions indicated. This should not be an issue for most modern Linux
distributions.
And then just list the packages:
* Bash-2.05a
* Binutils-2.12
* Bzip2-1.0.2
* etc
I have no preference as to that. I do agree that I don't care much for
the layout, but for me, the problem is in the look of the bullets.
Perhaps Manuel has a suggestion as to what would look better?
Also, the sentence
This second option can also be seen as a gauge of your current Linux
skills. If this second requirement is too steep, then the LFS book will
not likely be much use to you at this time.
Seems a little harsh.
Yes, it does and should probably be changed. Keep in mind that was there
before. :)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
