#1912: Possible bad interaction of udev rules for duplicate devices
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: [email protected]
Type: defect | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.3
Component: Book | Version: SVN
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Moving the rules to 70-* definitely seems like the right thing to do if
the scripts expect that name. And I would agree that it's better to use
the upstream provided scripts and only suggest manually written rules as a
last resort.
I haven't looked at the scripts really, so I don't know exactly how these
would interact. ENV{GENERATED}="1" is added by the scripts, correct? In
that case, telling users to add this to their rules seems like a dirty
thing to do.
It seems like removing 7.12.1 is the right way to go and let
write_cd_aliases do its thing. However, it might be nice to leave some of
the info about finding your CD drive in case you want to make a symlink
like /dev/samsung or something. Just not something that would collide with
the script aliases.
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1912>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
