Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:51:39AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Author: bdubbs >> Date: 2007-08-11 09:51:39 -0600 (Sat, 11 Aug 2007) >> New Revision: 8306 >> > >> <!ENTITY linux-ch8-du "310 - 390 MB"> >> <!ENTITY linux-ch8-sbu "1.5 - 3.5 SBU"> >> > I'm dubious that the kernel can be built in 310MB. I was in the > middle of measuring some alternative configs when you put this in. > Using 'allnoconfig' with a few extra options to make something that > might have a chance of booting (ext2, ext3, a nic) I got the > following figures from du -sk: > > the linux-2.6.22.2 tree after building 339680 (KB) > the bzImage 1112 > System.map 336 > .config 20 > Documentation 10856 > giving a total of 352004 KB or 343.75 MB. > > Similarly, when building the headers, my linux-2.6.22.2 tree came > to 307260 KB and the dest directory (what we copy to /usr/include) > used a further 3548 KB. In my terms that is 304.5M not the 286MB > I've already complained about. My figures are on ext3 using the > default 4K page size. > > Conclusion - take the space figures with a very big pinch of salt.
OK, what numbers would you suggest? How about "340 - 390 MB"? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
