On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 08:53:43AM +1000, Greg Schafer wrote: > Hmm, you've just introduced optimization into LFS. AFAIK the LFS mantra > has always been no optimization (not that I'm fussed, but this change is > definitely wrong if "no optimization" is still the rule). At the very > least, this aspect needs to be documented more prominently ie: why LFS no > longer supports i386, why LFS is deviating from the GCC dev's defaults, > etc, etc.
I agree. However, at the moment, I'm working on a test - I'll share the results shortly. For an admittedly brief discussion on the above, see: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2018 -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
