#2111: Adding PACO to LFS
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  spinal84     |        Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  enhancement  |       Status:  new                          
 Priority:  normal       |    Milestone:  7.0                          
Component:  Book         |      Version:  7.0                          
 Severity:  normal       |   Resolution:                               
 Keywords:               |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment (by spinal84):

 Replying to [comment:3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 > I'm really not sure that LFS needs to do anything more regarding package
 management.  We already point out various alternative package management
 schemes.

 Almost everybody using LFS needs good package management tool. All these
 techniques from the book are very hard to understand to newbies in linux
 and LFS. Taking in account my experience in LFS the first time I installed
 all LFS packages using instructions from the book. Then I installed some
 packages from BLFS. Then I found the tool called PACO, I installed it and
 saw it's good and what I needed for long time ago. Of course in some time
 I had to reinstall all my LFS+BLFS system just to use paco because my
 upgrades scattered the system.[[BR]]
 I think everybody like orderliness in their linux systems. I read about
 other package management systems in LFS. They all are hard, complicated
 and/or inconvenient not only for newbies but experienced users too. They
 are just tools to play with (to get some experience) nothing more.
 Oppositely paco is fast, convenient and easy way to manage packages. Paco
 is written specially for LFS users. Why not include it as native package
 management tool?

 > I still see LFS as the base of these other requirements.  We provide the
 instructions required to build a (hopefully) robust yet small Linux
 system.

 {{{
 $ paco -s paco
 318k  paco-2.0.3
 }}}

 Paco size in my system is only 318kb (without stripping). I hope it's no
 too big for LFS? ;-)

 > Other projects, such as blfs, jhalfs, etc. provide additional features
 on top of that.

 I'm not speaking about including paco as addition feature. I'm speaking
 about making paco the one of the heart tools for LFS system just like
 linux kernel. It should be native package management tool for LFS. Just
 like grub is made native boot loader in opposition to lilo and others.

 And if someone won't be satisfied with paco (for example some people
 making LFS extremely small) they can easy remove paco from the system:

 {{{
 # paco -r paco
 rm -fr /var/log/paco
 }}}

 If someone works on embedded system based on LFS he can use paco to
 manage/upgrade system and then remove it when going to production. Even
 here paco should be integrated in LFS book.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2111#comment:6>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to