#2111: Adding PACO to LFS
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  spinal84     |        Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  enhancement  |       Status:  new                          
 Priority:  normal       |    Milestone:  7.0                          
Component:  Book         |      Version:  7.0                          
 Severity:  normal       |   Resolution:                               
 Keywords:               |  
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 Replying to [comment:6 spinal84]:
 >
 > Almost everybody using LFS needs good package management tool. All these
 techniques from the book are very hard to understand to newbies in linux
 and LFS.

 Newbies to linux aren't supposed to be building LFS in the first place.

 > I think everybody like orderliness in their linux systems. I read about
 other package management systems in LFS. They all are hard, complicated
 and/or inconvenient not only for newbies but experienced users too. They
 are just tools to play with (to get some experience) nothing more.
 Oppositely paco is fast, convenient and easy way to manage packages. Paco
 is written specially for LFS users. Why not include it as native package
 management tool?

 Because adding a native packagement to LFS would just turn LFS into
 another distro, and partially eliminate the point of LFS - to build
 whatever system you want.

 > And if someone won't be satisfied with paco (for example some people
 making LFS extremely small) they can easy remove paco from the system:
 >
 > {{{
 > # paco -r paco
 > rm -fr /var/log/paco
 > }}}

 I'm of the opinion that it's always easier to add something like paco (or
 any other package management scheme, or even any package in general) to
 generic (non-package-management-specific) instructions, than to have the
 book assume package management and expect users to *remove* that if they
 don't want it.

 >
 > If someone works on embedded system based on LFS he can use paco to
 manage/upgrade system and then remove it when going to production. Even
 here paco should be integrated in LFS book.

 LFS should not use any package management scheme. It's not that difficult
 to simply take whatever package management techique you want and integrate
 it into your own LFS system.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2111#comment:8>
LFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/>
Linux From Scratch: Your Distro, Your Rules.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to