On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:35:05PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:36:53PM -0600, Andrew Elian wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
>  Hi
> > 
> > The approach I took was to install into DESTDIR (and etc) and then use
> > dpkg to keep track of things.  However, I differ from your approach, in
> > that I do that as root.  Not as safe, perhaps, but I've not run into the
> > errors you have mentioned when working as root.
> > 
>  Until I started to rewrite my scripts, everything from about the
> beginning of chapter 6 has been done as root (I have backups for
> completed systems, builds are expendable).  For the LFS packages,
> I'm keen not to deviate too far from the book, otherwise I'll cause
> myself pain in translating between the one and the other.  For BLFS,
> since I'm revising my scripts, I would prefer to build as a user.
> 

 (closing this - sorry about tihe length, but if it saves anyone else
from wasting their time on this fool's errand then it might be
worthwhile)

 So, I got sudo working well enough to try DESTDIR installs : my
normal user is *never* going to be allowed to do this (too easy to
accidentally run an update without thinking, or when my blood sugar
is low), but I always create an 'lfs' user so that I can build the
next system.  *That* user can do this, but only with the root
password (so, su - lfs and then enter the root password when starting
the script - after that, good to go for 12 hours on this pty : I
loathe scripts which time out ;).  For a straightforward package,
that appears to work well enough, and simplifies the logging (just
log what is in the DESTDIR).  Unfortunately, the problems come with
the non-simple packages.

 I'm aware that some packages fail in a user DESTDIR install because
commands such as chmod fail.  What I've now found is that building
xulrunner is a real PITA (and, since firefox is one of the packages I
update most frequently, currently with xulrunner, for me it is a
showstopper).  For a while, the DESTDIR install worked, but it also
removed all the *.pyc files, which meant that a later *real* install
failed.  So, people who use DESTDIR probably ought to manually
install from the DESTDIR, and remember to run ldconfig.  I thought I
could work around the missing *.pyc files, for the moment, by
touching a .pyc file - but the DESTDIR install now fails before it
gets that far:

WARNING: Found 24 duplicate files taking 45426 bytes
Stripped 76860 bytes
Deoptimized 0/1151 in ./omni.ja
/scratch/lfs/building/mozilla-release/xulrunner-build-dir/config/nsinstall
-D /scratch/lfs/building/destdir/usr/lib/xulrunner-15.0.1
(cd ../../dist/xulrunner && tar -cvhf - .) | \
  (cd /scratch/lfs/building/destdir/usr/lib/xulrunner-15.0.1 && tar
-xf -)
/bin/sh: line 1: cd:
/scratch/lfs/building/destdir/usr/lib/xulrunner-15.0.1: No such file
or directory
./
./libxpcom.so
make[1]: *** [install] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/scratch/lfs/building/mozilla-release/xulrunner-build-dir/xulrunner/installer'

 because the symlink for xulrunner-15.0.1 points to
../mozilla-plugins : no idea why it worked the first time, but
already I've noted that doing a "correct" DESTDIR install for
logging (i.e. with all the subsequent moves and whatevers) is
aggravating.  And what do I gain ? - as far as I can tell, merely
simpler logging (as in : no need to create -before and -after logs,
and then diff them).  If the BLFS book wants to encourage people to
copy and paste in non-scripted installs, that is fine.  But for me
it just causes pain when I'm running scripts.

 Also, using sudo to install xulrunner means that a regular user
cannot rm -rf mozilla-release.

 I'll further note that fixing up sudo doesn't really give me any
added security - it was interesting to learn how to do that, but
AFAICS the benefit is zero.  So, when I'm running my scripts to do
the installs (but not when preparing edits for BLFS, after I find
that the package seems to work when I *use* it), DESTDIR is a waste
of time : if ever I'm tempted to revisit this, please shoot me..

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-chat
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to