Bryan Kadzban wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
I suppose the 20 line scan.l hunk in it is redundant, though it's not
going to save that much space in the grand scheme of things.
It won't save space, but removing that file from the patch will prevent
scan.c from being rebuilt. Which was (part of) the whole point.
Well, I shuffled the scan.l and scan.c parts around so that scan.c
wouldn't be rebuilt (`patch' should touch scan.c last, thereby fooling
`make' into thinking that scan.c is up to date).
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
