> It's "provided" by the kernel, though, I think. I get the same output > from ldd, and my system works.
Yes, the 2.6.x kernel uses this gate for 64bit kernel space with 32 bit user space translations of syscalls. >>The $LFS was built with a SuSE 9.3 host system, maybe this is an >>issue. > > Possibly. Which kernel does the host run? 2.6.11.4-20a-smp, so a 2.6.11.4 kernel with a lot of SuSE stuff on top of it :) >>Or maybe because I do not mount sysfs? > > I doubt that that's the reason it fails, but why aren't you mounting it? I does not make any sense. I only chroot, I don't boot, I don't need any hardware support for chroot(). I provided the necessary block and char devices in a sparsely static populated /dev, also a muxer is installed via bind mounted /dev/pts. > As someone else said, it might be related to ld-linux.so.2, also. I'm > not sure how to look into that, though... There's nothing really much to do if the file is there and was created correctly (readelf seems to imply so). I think statically linking would be the best option anyway for such crucial tools like env, bash ... . Thanks for you help though, Roberto Nibali, ratz -- ------------------------------------------------------------- addr://Rathausgasse 31, CH-5001 Aarau tel://++41 62 823 9355 http://www.terreactive.com fax://++41 62 823 9356 ------------------------------------------------------------- terreActive AG Wir sichern Ihren Erfolg ------------------------------------------------------------- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
