Patches should be under the same license than the original software. That is at least GPL requirement and most packages are distributed under GPL terms. My $.02 G On Friday 22 July 2005 17:01, Henrik S. Hansen wrote: > Hi > > I have a question regarding the licensing of the patches used in > the LFS book (version 6.1). It is not clearly stated anywhere what > the license for these patches are. I assume that the patches > written by LFS developers are under the same license as the book. > Is this correct? > > I think it would be wise to clarify this issue, or even better: > have a written policy that any patches that go in LFS must be under > a free software license. > > Regards, > Henrik S. Hansen
-- Blog: http://seattlegaucho.blogspot.com "No! Try not. Do, or do not. There is no spoon." ...Yoda to Neo -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
