On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 00:24 -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
<SNIP>
> That said, for a by-the-book LFS + BLFS installation it doesn't make
> much sense to have multiple directories since there is only one
> version of automake installed. That is the reason I symlink them on my
> system.
Heh, same here, though after immense amounts of pain getting obstinate
packages to build I'm wondering if we should not be taking a similar
route with auto{conf,make} as is taken with gentoo. ie: install multiple
versions of each and use a wrapper script to drive them...
Ever noticed that when you do actually need to use autofoo it is always
some older version required...
This probably isn't a discussion for lfs-dev though...
Regards
[R]
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
