Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
they could have very easily replied to the change on lfs-book, or emailed Jim personally.
You kind of hit the nail there. There are people who thought, or assumed, that this was already happening. I can understand that the type of change that was made would go against such an assumption. It was just a misunderstanding in the end.
Even the misunderstanding was probably justified. I myself have thought a few times that it was all but official already, and everybody seemed to have treated it as such.
Things are rapidly becoming speculation and conjecture at this point. Jim's at the beach with his kids right now and trying to enjoy some sunshine. Let's leave this for what it is until Jim is back and can provide some feedback too. Though, I'm sure it's become a moot point at that time.
*leaving the dead horse well alone and moving on* -- Gerard Beekmans /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
