El Miércoles, 27 de Julio de 2005 00:10, Randy McMurchy escribió:

> I would like to think that if Cross-LFS has a chance at becoming the
> default build method, the group should be involved with the project
> from the beginning.At least that's how I see it.

Nothing prevent to you or other people to review the cross-lfs book and send 
your comments, sugestions, compliments or improvements. Any feellback will be 
apreciated.

But that is yet a play-branch where we (the people currently invloved on that 
brach) are creating a POC for a possible new generation of LFS books. Then, 
like in any POC, we should can made any change on our onw.

At this moment the branch is usable and can be used to build test systems, but 
nothing is in stolen. There is no timeline to merge it on trunk, and before 
do that, the community will be able to decide if or what from cross-lfs will 
be merged to trunk.


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to