El Miércoles, 27 de Julio de 2005 00:10, Randy McMurchy escribió: > I would like to think that if Cross-LFS has a chance at becoming the > default build method, the group should be involved with the project > from the beginning.At least that's how I see it.
Nothing prevent to you or other people to review the cross-lfs book and send your comments, sugestions, compliments or improvements. Any feellback will be apreciated. But that is yet a play-branch where we (the people currently invloved on that brach) are creating a POC for a possible new generation of LFS books. Then, like in any POC, we should can made any change on our onw. At this moment the branch is usable and can be used to build test systems, but nothing is in stolen. There is no timeline to merge it on trunk, and before do that, the community will be able to decide if or what from cross-lfs will be merged to trunk. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page