On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:46:03PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > What I believe folks should do is too simply agree with the proposal, > or provide an argument against it. So far, there's only been > positives, folks sitting on the fence not contributing a rebuttal > notwithstanding.
Here is an argument, then: it isn't needed for a base development system as proven by 6 years of its absence. There is no valid technical reason to include it or exclude it. It's merely a choice. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
