Archaic wrote: > Then the argument stays, but the terms change. Instead of arguing > specific uid/gid, it will be how best to arrange it. It is a policy > decision. As such, I like an arbitrary system with an emphasis in each > book that they are merely suggestions and not set in stone (though I'm > sure most *will* just use the book's values).
I agree that the uid/gid numbers are suggestions. I thought we said that in BLFS at: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/postlfs/users.html "Generally the specific uid or gid numbers used by these applications are not significant." We tried to explain the issues there. If there is a way to improve the discussion, please let me know. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
