Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
=
If anyone wants any other features included now's the time to get those
requests in.
Do you want to consider gcc-4.1?
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/
May I beg and plea for a good, healthy HELL NO? :-) With previous
release history, regressions have been a pain...wait until at least
4.1.1 or 4.1.2 even to let the dust settle a bit (obviously I mean for
release, 4.1.0 is good for devel so we can figure it out ahead of time).
OOo-1.1.4 suffered from 3.3-3.4.x regressions (real compiler bugs, not
code problems with the version change)...it had to sit and wait until
the second round of 3.4 fixes (3.4.2) before dropping the heavy gcc-3.3
dep. Although I never tested 4.0.0, 4.0.1 was okay. 4.0.0 would be
interesting to see if the current instructions work when I have some
time to blow.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
