Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> In any case, I couldn't find a 4.1 tarball and did a svn checkout of the
>> 4.1 branch.
>
>
> That's because 4.1 has only just branched for their stabilisation. I'd
> imagine the official release is still a good couple of months away,
> given GCC's previous release schedules.
Yes, I see that now. The 4.0 release was almost two months after they
cut the 4.0 branch. In any case I built it on a glibc-2.3.4 system, but
didn't install it. I did run the test suite and got:
XPASS: gcc.dg/cpp/cmdlne-dI-M.c scan-file
(^|\\\\n)cmdlne-dI-M.*:[^\\\\n]*cmdlne
-dI-M.c
XPASS: gcc.dg/cpp/cmdlne-dM-M.c scan-file
(^|\\\\n)cmdlne-dM-M[^\\\\n]*:[^\\\\n]
*cmdlne-dM-M.c
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-62.c scan-tree-dump-times not vectorized:
redundant loop.
no profit to vectorize. 1
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 37847
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 95
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests 234
--
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 11665
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 65
# of unsupported tests 64
/home/bdubbs/gcc-build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 4.1.0 20051125
(prerelease)
--
=== libmudflap Summary ===
# of expected passes 1789
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3394
# of expected failures 13
# of unsupported tests 315
Compiler version: 4.1.0 20051125 (prerelease)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
-------------------
Only one failure--seems pretty good to me, but we need to wait for the
release.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
