Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Give them the basics, show them how to extend, warn about possible pitfalls and provide an example. Doing this we're not leaving them with a half-baked system, as some have said already - we're teaching them how to complete the system themselves which is what LFS has always been about first and foremost.
As another lurker/user rather than a contributor, I'd also concur with Joshua's POV.
It seems to me however that for the way most "regular" users of LFS do things (I mean a customised, scripted LFS/BLFS system) it would make perfect sense to have a L/B/C/H/X/LFS standard set of users, groups and rules. This might potentially need a separate project so that all contributors could assist.
Just my tuppence worth... Al -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
