Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/04/07 12:31 CST: > I was thinking for after the release, but if you want to give it a > whirl and Randy approves, go for it.
Gosh, I'm sort of torn on that one. Does the note in the book accomplish the mission? If so, I think we should leave it the way it is for 6.2.0. For any other later release, I'm sure it would be fine. This seems to go a bit further than an average "defect". -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:37:00 up 25 days, 12:51, 1 user, load average: 0.36, 0.23, 0.27 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
