On 2/4/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/04/07 12:31 CST: > > > I was thinking for after the release, but if you want to give it a > > whirl and Randy approves, go for it. > > Gosh, I'm sort of torn on that one. > > Does the note in the book accomplish the mission? If so, I think we > should leave it the way it is for 6.2.0. For any other later release, > I'm sure it would be fine. This seems to go a bit further than an > average "defect".
I guess it's more for the benefit of scripters, which I think most people do for Xorg-7 since there are so many packages. This would be a big benefit for jhalfs, which has to add a lot of kludges for Xorg-7. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
