I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation is acceptable or not.
I build glibc as detailed and then run "make -k check " with output being dumped via tee into glibc-check-log. The make -k check ends with these lines : make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/build/glibc-2.7' make: *** [check] Error 2 The errors seen are thus : root:/sources/build/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: *** [/sources/build/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/build/glibc-build/math/test-ildoubl.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [math/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/build/glibc-build/string/stratcliff.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [string/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/build/glibc-build/wcsmbs/wcsatcliff.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [wcsmbs/tests] Error 2 make[2]: [/sources/build/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: *** [/sources/build/glibc-build/crypt/sha256c-test.out] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/sources/build/glibc-build/crypt/sha512c-test.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [crypt/tests] Error 2 make[2]: *** [/sources/build/glibc-build/elf/check-localplt.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2 make: *** [check] Error 2 root:/sources/build/glibc-build# Other than the "posix/annexc.out" error that was predicted I am somewhat less than thrilled at the math errors related to long doubles, the errors for crypto functions and then there are errors related to a string function. Should I be worried ? Dennis -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
