Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/18/08 13:11 CST:
> I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation
> is acceptable or not.

I cannot answer that either. You've received more errors than I
have while building in several different environments.


> Should I be worried ?

I'm really not qualified to answer that. However, in the spirit
of trying to be helpful, here is information from 3 different
recent builds of Glibc:

First, here's results from using CLFS techniques for a multilib
build (note that I'm using GCC-4.2.2 during these builds)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media/hdb1/build/Installed$ grep Error glibc*/check.log
glibc-2.7-32bit/check.log:make[2]: *** 
[/build/glibc-build/math/test-double.out] Error 1
glibc-2.7-32bit/check.log:make[1]: *** [math/tests] Error 2
glibc-2.7-32bit/check.log:make[2]: [/build/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 
1 (ignored)
glibc-2.7-32bit/check.log:make: *** [check] Error 2
glibc-2.7-64bit/check.log:make[2]: [/build/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 
1 (ignored)

Now a build from regular LFS using a 32bit Athlon:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /mnt/rml2/home/rml/build > grep Error 
/mnt/rml5/build/Installed/glibc*/check.log
make[2]: [/build/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)

So, bottom line for me is I don't see any errors other than the
math/test-double error in a 32bit multilib build. Both the 64bit
multilib and regular LFS (not JH branch) don't get any errors.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
13:19:01 up 61 days, 4:07, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.10, 0.04
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to