Selon Mateusz Grotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Bruce Dubbs pisze: > > Mateusz Grotek wrote: > > ... > >> and that's all. With this fix it works correctly and this sed thing if > >> LFS book isn't needed. You could ask why this solution is better than fix? > >> It is, because it enables you not to use bash for ldd. I donno if glibc > >> works without bash, but i saw that this was the only thing which needed > >> changing in glibc. So i suppose now you can use dash instead of bash for > >> default shell, if you want. LFS should be flexible right? > >> So little patch for glibc would be better than this sed script. > >> Mateusz Grotek > >> > > > > This is better asked on lfs-support. > > > > To answer your question: > > sudo ln -sf bash /bin/sh > > > > -- Bruce > > > > > > No. It's not support question. It's suggestion for a LFS book. While > installing glibc you have to change @BASH@ to /bin/bash. But this is > more general solution. Just make a patch for glibc. > -- Patching is costly to maintain and more subject to breakage.
Another solution for glibc than the sed is to use CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash It should achieve the same result than the sed. Gilles -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
