Selon Mateusz Grotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes. I understand that. So i'm trying to send this patch to libc-alpha > too. I donno if glibc utilities would work with dash (without bash > installed). But if it is possible, we could give users choice which > shell they like. People from ubuntu made dash default shell, so why we > couldn't do it? Is it fair to force users to have bash installed? With > BLFS it could be, because many packages depend on it in their scripts. > But LFS should be more basic i suppose. you don't have to build any > package from BLFS if you don't want to. But you MUST to build all > packages from LFS if you want your system. So let's give the users > choice. I donno if other packages from LFS depends on bash installed. If > there are some, this issue doesn't matter. Do you know if there are any? > -- glibc developper could be not so open for example http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2008-05/msg00058.html
Gilles -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
