I would prefer if it didn't take us another year (or more) to push out a 
7.0 release. Or, even if it did, as long as the time is well spent. 
I.E., we are actually pursuing the new features we slated and not just 
letting package updates slowly creep in.

I know we have listed things before, but can we get a solid picture of 
what new features we are bringing in for 7.0? I'll start us off:

* 64-bit support
* Multilib?
* DESTDIR style PM support? (To me, this is the easiest way of offering 
a default pseudo-style PM support. We don't actually tell the users how 
to package up the binaries, track dependencies or track what is 
installed, but we do show whatever DESTDIR-compatible commands exist for 
the package so that LFS can be that much more compatible with a wide 
range of PM offerings).

Anything else?

Also, as far as the 64-bit stuff goes, I don't think the task should be 
left up to just me. It would be nice to get some other hands on that. If 
we're planning on using anything that's already existing in the jh 
branch to port over to trunk, perhaps we should just copy again to 
another 64-bit branch for use by everyone. I would hope that would 
encourage a few devs to get their hands dirty with it.

--
JH
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to