Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Even it it's poor hardware support, does the frequency of occurrence rise to > the > level of needing to be in the LFS book? As several comments in the ticket > suggest, initramfs would be more appropriate for BLFS, but I'm thinking that > even that is too much and an updated hint or wiki entry would be more > appropriate.
BLFS would be OK if accompanied with a pointer on the kernel page in LFS. Hint or wiki entry is certainly not OK, because of the new LiveCD policy: packages beyond BLFS are not permitted. I.e., the new LiveCD will support LVM and RAID only if there is a corresponding page in LFS or BLFS. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
