On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:22:48 -0500, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4. Ticket 2284, upgrade of Udev, and strip out udev-config. I doubt this > needs its own branch. What sort of time/work is involved here? I've already got the trivial patch that upgrades Udev, but doesn't strip out Udev-config. It's been build-tested but not boot-tested currently. It may have an impact on the minimum host-kernel pre-req, but I don't have anything to test on to confirm/deny this. My proposal would be to just chuck it over the wall and see what breaks - this is trunk after all :-) I certainly don't think it needs its own branch. I think stripping out Udev-Config is fairly safe too - the discrepancies I flagged may cause some breakage in some esoteric use cases/devices but I think by and large people will still be able to boot and use LFS-based systems. Any breakage can be easily rectified by including new rules in an LFS-format patch, which can then be submitted upstream for their consideration. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
