Greg Schafer wrote:
> The other thing you've omitted is proper attribution. A simple "Thanks,
> me" is not good enough for something this big. The LFS changelog is not
> perpetual. You of all people should know how much time and effort goes
> into engineering this stuff. Some extra words next to my existing entry on
> the Acknowledgments page will suffice. "... Technical Writer and Architect
> of the Next Generation 64-bit-enabling Build Method" or similar.
>
> It's a good question. It's easy for me in DIY because I actively target
> scripting. Because LFS targets the interactive command line, you'll have
> to be careful not to introduce too much awkwardness. But whatever you do,
> you *must* introduce a 32-bit Glibc in the 64-bit case. I'm even
> considering dropping pure 64-bit in DIY because its usefulness is limited.
>
>
Wow, Greg we are actually and the same page!!!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
