Jim Gifford wrote: > Enough on that subject,
OK. Time to move on. > As far as LFS Dev privs, thanx but no thanx. You can delete them, not to > mention, someone changed by password on me a while back, because they > were afraid when CLFS moved away to it's own servers. I have no interest > in LFS goals, except to help out with any issues that my expertise can > be useful. OK, but as far as I'm concerned, you are welcome. I'll reset your password if you want. No problem either way. > CLFS is a subproject of LFS. CLFS does have a separate leadership, Ryan, > Joe, and myself. CLFS is not fork. > CLFS does have developers that work exclusively on CLFS projects. > CLFS does have it's own servers. > CLFS does use a different license. > > CLFS was originally intended to be the future of LFS, not necessarily > the cross-compiling, but pulling the updates required by new releases of > the toolchain. As it has been stated, CLFS can be easily be modified > make a LFS style book with no cross compiling. That's clear enough. I think its good to share each other's ideas. I hope that we can all benefit from whatever CLFS or DIY or LFS is doing. I want us all to be colleagues who respect all input. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
