Randy McMurchy wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > >> The major reason for the existence of the LSB is to support ISVs who >> want to distribute software for linux. They want to have some base to >> be able to say "here's a package that will work on your system". If >> you don't want or need to support that, the LSB is not for you. > > Seems LFS is more the opposite, "give us the source and we make the > package work for our system". And if so, perhaps we don't even need > to be LSB compliant.
In general, yes. However, I want to explain to users how to make their system LSB compliant and also explain why they might (or might not) want to do so. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
