Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > >> Dan Nicholson wrote: >> >> >>> The major reason for the existence of the LSB is to support ISVs who >>> want to distribute software for linux. They want to have some base to >>> be able to say "here's a package that will work on your system". If >>> you don't want or need to support that, the LSB is not for you. >>> >> Seems LFS is more the opposite, "give us the source and we make the >> package work for our system". And if so, perhaps we don't even need >> to be LSB compliant. >> > > In general, yes. However, I want to explain to users how to make their > system > LSB compliant and also explain why they might (or might not) want to do so. > > -- Bruce > > This is why I am in agreement with the whole idea. Continue to increase the educational value of the books with this endeavor.
James -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
