Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would the following rewording be enough?
This may be pure semantics, but i find the following passage somewhat unsettling... > ...this removes ANY potential contamination of the target system by > LESSENING the chance of headers or libraries from the host being > incorporated into the new tools. Because of the two highlighted words, this sounds a bit indecisive to me; "removes ANY potential contamination" implies 100% security, while "LESSENING the chance" implies less than 100%. If this technique provides a truly secure result, then perhaps "LESSENING" should be replaced with a more emphatic term, such as "PRECLUDING" or "NEGATING"..? Dean -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
