dean talbot wrote: > Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Would the following rewording be enough? > > This may be pure semantics, but i find the following passage somewhat > unsettling... > >> ...this removes ANY potential contamination of the target system by >> LESSENING the chance of headers or libraries from the host being >> incorporated into the new tools. > > Because of the two highlighted words, this sounds a bit indecisive to > me; "removes ANY potential contamination" implies 100% security, while > "LESSENING the chance" implies less than 100%. > > If this technique provides a truly secure result, then perhaps > "LESSENING" should be replaced with a more emphatic term, such as > "PRECLUDING" or "NEGATING"..?
OK, I made a tweak to the wording: "this method removes potential contamination of the target system by lessening -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
