On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Matthew Burgess < [email protected]> wrote:
> I just committed a fix for this (see #2738), and verified it now: > > $ wget > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc-2.12.1-makefile_fix-1.patch > --2010-08-11 20:52:51-- > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc-2.12.1-makefile_fix-1.patch > Resolving www.linuxfromscratch.org... 216.171.237.234 > Connecting to www.linuxfromscratch.org|216.171.237.234|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 1032 (1.0K) [text/plain] > Saving to: `glibc-2.12.1-makefile_fix-1.patch' > > 100%[======================================>] 1,032 --.-K/s in 0s > > 2010-08-11 20:52:51 (24.8 MB/s) - `glibc-2.12.1-makefile_fix-1.patch' saved > [1032/1032] > > $ md5sum glibc-2.12.1-makefile_fix-1.patch > 0ef634ac78e582f45d0e7643bfda7505 glibc-2.12.1-makefile_fix-1.patch > Thanks Matt. I'm going to just wait for the dust to settle a bit. The md5sum for my downloaded patch is the same you reported in your email (although the md5sum values in patches.ent in the latest svn version (9354) hasn't been yet updated.) However, the patch was rejected when i tried to apply it. If nobody else reports this then surely I'm doing something wrong and I'll figure it out after the md5sum in patches.ent is correct. --Troy
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
