Selon Andrew Benton <[email protected]>: > On 16/08/10 08:28, Gilles Espinasse wrote: > > Except this fix is not the right one, see > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg137741.html > > and the real fix should be the patch in the next message from that thread. > > > The way I read that thread, the patch Thomas proposes fixes the problem > of ip route get giving no output but introduces a bug with respect to > IPv6. As I read it, the patch you point to fixes this new bug. > Personally I don't use IPv6 yet so this issue is not worth patching. > > Andy > -- I do not use IPv6 too but only the second patch is needed. See the question after the second patch http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg137743.html and the answer next.
Gilles -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
