On 16/08/10 10:25, Gilles Espinasse wrote: > Selon Andrew Benton<[email protected]>: > >> The way I read that thread, the patch Thomas proposes fixes the problem >> of ip route get giving no output but introduces a bug with respect to >> IPv6. As I read it, the patch you point to fixes this new bug. >> Personally I don't use IPv6 yet so this issue is not worth patching. >> > I do not use IPv6 too but only the second patch is needed. > See the question after the second patch > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg137743.html > and the answer next. >
I stand corrected. Sorry for the noise. On 16/08/10 09:50, Matthew Burgess wrote: > sed -i '1289i\ filter.cloned = 2;' ip/iproute.c > One little nitpic, using a tab is fewer characters and matches the style of the rest of the file: sed -i '1289i\\tfilter.cloned = 2;' ip/iproute.c Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
