On 1/26/2012 12:32 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:27:04 +0100, Pierre Labastie<[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if anybody still uses jhalfs, and if he(she) has tried ICA >> lately. > I use jhalfs all the time, but I've never done an ICA build with it. > >> ICA is broken because of the part in glibc's instructions, which >> instructs 'test-installation.pl' to look for /usr/lib rather than >> /tools/lib. On the second (and following) pass, the line 'DL=...' sets >> DL to empty (because /tools has been removed). Then the sed creates >> a flawed 'test-installation.pl'. >> >> Here is a patch which could be applied inside the LFS subdirectory >> of jhalfs: > Thanks, I'll apply that this evening. > >> Let me know if my efforts on jhalfs may be useful. It seems that >> my post on jhalfs-discuss has reached nobody... Besides adding >> package management, which you can simply disable by setting >> package management to n (this is the default) in the config menu, >> I spotted a few other bugs in the handling of tests. For example, >> look for the line "ulimits..." before tests in gcc, in the scripts >> from current jhalfs. > I monitor alfs-discuss too, but have no interest in package management > hence made no comment on it :-) I guess if the patch doesn't break things > for none-package-management uses then it could be applied with a minimum > of discussion really. > I noticed the patch too but haven't had time to thoroughly review it yet. But I would say before it does get applied a new stable release of jhalfs as there have been a few fixes since the last stable so we have known good working version out there for the most recent versions of LFS.
Thomas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
