Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > So to be clear, Pierre is correct in that there is a serious flaw in the > current LFS SVN. In fact, until this gets resolved LFS SVN should be > considered completely broken. Having a chapter 5 toolchain that searches > /usr/include kills the purpose of building a separate temporary > toolchain at all.
s/serious// I agree that we need to fix this, but I think the actual problem is more potential than serious. It's unlikely that any headers incorrectly included will make the generated system work incorrectly without being highlighted like the gpm issue. I think we can get this fixed in the next couple of days. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
