On 04/22/2012 03:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > >> So to be clear, Pierre is correct in that there is a serious flaw in the >> current LFS SVN. In fact, until this gets resolved LFS SVN should be >> considered completely broken. Having a chapter 5 toolchain that searches >> /usr/include kills the purpose of building a separate temporary >> toolchain at all. > s/serious// > > I agree that we need to fix this, but I think the actual problem is more > potential than serious. It's unlikely that any headers incorrectly included > will make the generated system work incorrectly without being highlighted like > the gpm issue. > > I think we can get this fixed in the next couple of days. > > -- Bruce Well, I wasn't going to stick with it as I actually intended to use this one for a couple of months. I just restarted the build on the affected host with Pierre's proposed change. Should be able to give a thumbs up in about 45 minutes or so. I know it only affects SVN as I completed a 7.1 build not even a month ago using the same host.
-- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
