> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:21:54 -0500 > From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > To: LFS Developers Mailinglist <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Thoughts about LFS and systemd > . . > > I understand your concerns, but the development branch is for, well, > development. If what goes there needs to be reverted, that's not a > problem. [...]
Yes, and 'experimental' branches are often best for such degree/extent of experiment. Maybe I'm just so used to git - where e.g. branches are so 'inexpensive' - that it seems an absolute no-brainer that work of this type would be done on a separate branch. And in any event, you're still aiming at adding an "ifs'n'buts" layer to the lfs-main book - the type of thing that has been argued against many many times. I do think that the idea is of interest: but it's really a candidate for a separate branch/project. rgds, akh -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page