On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:59:22PM -0500, Laurence Dawson wrote:
>> It's not particularly slow - the host is a decent laptop (i5, 2 core +
>> hyperthreading), 16G Ram. I only gave the vm 1g and 1 cpu, but wasn't doing
>> anything heavy apart from the lfs build at the time. The only part that
>> might look slow is the disk - I'm using virtual box dynamic expanding disk,
>> and if the test is expanding the amount of disk needed, then it might be
>> getting a slow response from the storage system.
>>
>> After reading a little about cilk, it is about parallel processing. I'm
>> wondering if the fact that I gave the vm a single cpu is causing it to
>> deadlock.
>>
> For running tests with gcc-5, anything more than -j1 has caused
> problems (random failures) on my machines so I now use -j1 for 'make
> check'. So I doubt that only having one CPU is the problem.
>
> Perhaps the 'disk' is slow, or 1GB RAM is too little. I don't think
> I ever tried to build gcc-5 in a machine or a VM with less than 4GB.
>
> I suspect that you will probably be ok if you let the LFS build
> complete and then try to use it, but we've really got no idea why
> you are getting these failures.
>
I tried giving it 8G ram and an extra cpu (though I didn't use -j2).
The 'disk' was probably faster too, as it had already been expanded
enough during the last build. Worked a lot better see below - only one
unexpected failure, and just for the reference, it looks like this
one:
FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand
"\\(call [^\\ncc_on_device" 0
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 93236
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 339
# of unsupported tests 3645
/sources/gcc-build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ version 5.1.0 (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand
"\\\\(call [^\\\\n]* acc_on_device" 0
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 113926
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 259
# of unsupported tests 1807
/sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 5.1.0 (GCC)
> Also, please don't top-post.
My bad, sorry.
>
> ĸen
> --
> Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady.
> Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m.
> --
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
