On 12.6.2015 17:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Laurence Dawson wrote:=== g++ Summary === # of expected passes 93236 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 339 # of unsupported tests 3645 /sources/gcc-build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ version 5.1.0 (GCC) === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand "\\\\(call [^\\\\n]* acc_on_device" 0 === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 113926 # of unexpected failures 1 # of expected failures 259 # of unsupported tests 1807 /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 5.1.0 (GCC)If your only failure is that one, then you are doing pretty well. One out of about 200,000 is not very much. By the way, google is your friend: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66332 -- Bruce
Contains a fix that "fixes a test case" (one more reason for me to find tests useless) to mark it as "expected failure" (and another reason).
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
