On 28 October 2015 at 09:28, Emanuele Rusconi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 October 2015 at 06:36, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>>
>>> Craig Garner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Index: creat-comm.xml
>>>
>>>
>>> Er, not being a lawyer I'm not completely sure, but I would be *very*
>>> careful
>>> changing any license text.  Having the license be anything other than
>>> exactly
>>> equivalent to the original seems like a potential issue to me, given the
>>> number of jurisdictions it has to apply to and the work that the Creative
>>> Commons people have already done.
>>
>>
>> Yes, we will leave that one alone.
>>
>>   -- Bruce
>
> Besides, "synching" and "copyrightable" are perfectly valid spellings
> (as "behaviour" is, by the way, which has been "corrected" in another
> chapter).

Furthermore, "copyrightable" exists as a genuine word in common
parlance, whereas "copyright-able" does not, and has just been
constructed on the fly by the OP.

Richard
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to